发信人: minotaur()
整理人: ssxia(2001-01-23 07:37:52), 站内信件
|
Even those players who think my way of playing is cheating, they have
to
use L/S in the way they view as cheating sometimes. Say, when you fina
lly
reach Roland or Archibald and find out that he has resurrect, what wil
l you
do? Although this is still a winnable situation, most people will rest
art
to avoid this. So, what's difference? We both have particular objectiv
e and
impose some conditionds on starting configuration to be able to get th
e
objective. They want a not so difficult win, I want a quickest win
possible. It is just that we have different objectives, thus imposing
different conditions. Many people will use L/S after making a mistake,
basically, what I do is similar. Just in my view, a mistake may be muc
h
smaller, an unnecessary extra move, a monster unnecessarily being kill
ed in
a fight. If this will endanger my plan for quickest win, that is a mis
take
for me.
Besides, the third way of playing is the only way to yield out a compa
rable
result for everyone. Otherwise, luck will determine the most part. Say
,
whether you get a couple of groups of dragons on the map in Greater Vi
ctory
will affect the speed of winning by more than 2 weeks. The way to elim
inate
luck is to allow everyone get full advantage of it. Also, noboday can
tell
if one used L/S and cheat code or not. I believed that I can win
Archibald's campaign in 100 days without using L/S or cheat code. Let
us
say I did this and gave that result instead of this 64 days campaign h
ere,
how many of you will believe me? Since nobody can tell whether one use
L/S
and cheat code or not, to get a camparable result, one has to allow
everybody to use it whatever way they like.
If you don't like my way of playing, forget about the days and scores
in
this guide, just read the strategies and plans here, find whether they
are
useful to you in whatever types of games you play.
--
※ 来源:．月光软件站 http://www.moon-soft.com．[FROM: 192.9.25.21]
|
|