发信人: jasper_chen()
整理人: jeter(2000-07-27 23:20:44), 站内信件
|
“早知道会给炒成这个样子，我就不发表这篇文章了。”
“什么叫以讹传讹，道听途说……”
“一些大报还比较严肃，但有些小报，他们真是什么都敢说”
“我现真的是非常worried”
“科研本身是单纯的，可是沾上人为的因素就……”
“你一定要在文中强调，研究者本人说，这个实验与相对论和因果律并不矛盾”
——碧海听潮声7月25日电话采访报道
--
MyScience科学新闻：www.myscience.com.cn
MyScience三思言论集：mysci.yeah.net
——我走着弯曲的直线，梦着宇宙的阴影——
※ 来源:．月光软件站 http://www.moon-soft.com．[FROM: 212.212.254.39]
发信人: shadowbox (hawk), 信区: Course
标 题: Re: 自然杂志刊登的王利军的文章
发信站: 网易虚拟社区 (Wed Jul 26 20:58:41 2000), 站内信件
【 在 litkidium (,)(,) 的大作中提到: 】
: Gain-assisted superluminal light propagation
:
: L. J. WANG, A. KUZMICH & A. DOGARIU
:
: .......
//信件标题:来自王利军本人的消息
原发信站:中国科大BBS站(Wed, 07 Jun 2000 11:11:06)
回信地址:[email protected] (Rookie)
我昨天给王利军博士发了一逢EMAIL，他给我回信说现在外面的消息纯粹
是炒做，以下是他回信的部分内容：
The news media are not scientific organizations. Their reporters
lack basic scientific training but normally overflow with
sensationality. The Internet publications should be viewed
with even great suspicion; they do not even follow the normal prudent
editorial procedure.
It is entirely possible that they publish something "citing" me
even I never said what they put up there, even though I don't know
what you are referring to.
Experimentally, we have observed a superluminal group velocity of
a light pulse in case you know what a "group velocity" is. Nothing
is broken; causality holds. What the experiment means is merely that
although a light pulse appears to travel faster, information cannot
be transmitted faster than c.
A manuscript describing the experiment is with NATURE and is not
published yet.
这里我们要注意两个概念，相速度和群速度，相速度可以超过光速而不
违反相对论。群速度不能超越光速。
--
※ 来源:．月光软件站 http://www.moon-soft.com．[FROM: 202.102.223.61]
|
|